Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Clin Toxicol (Phila) ; 60(5): 596-601, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1569458

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The lockdown periods imposed in 2020 by governments had deleterious consequences on population mental health. Several studies based on declarative data have suggested that the lockdown periods were associated with changes in psychoactive substance use but few relied on toxicological analyses. AIMS: We studied the impact of lockdowns on the pattern of routine care toxicological screening performed on patients hospitalized at the emergency ward (EW) and intensive care units (ICU) at the Grenoble University Hospital. METHOD: This was a retrospective, monocentric study comparing routine care toxicology biological tests performed in children older than 12 years of age and adults hospitalized at the ICU and EW in 2018, 2019, and 2020. Alcohol, illicit drugs, and medications were screened. Generalized linear models were generated to evaluate the effect of the lockdown periods on toxicology results, considering age and sex. RESULTS: The study included 13,910 samples from 11,786 patients. There was no significant difference in the repartition of sex or age over the three years. The frequency of positive toxicological tests increased during the lockdown periods (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.14, (1.01-1.28), p = .026). The frequency of poly-exposures also rose during these periods (OR 1.43 (1.11-1.82), p = .004) mostly among men (OR 1.54 (1.02-2.04), p = .022), 12-25-year-old patients (OR 1.69 (1.07-2.31), p = .016), and seniors (>56 years) (OR 1.54 (1.00-1.97), p = .032). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that lockdown episodes were associated with increased incidence of psychoactive substance poly-exposures, highlighting the need for preventive strategies for high-risk populations.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Adolescent , Adult , COVID-19/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Communicable Disease Control , Humans , Incidence , Male , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Young Adult
2.
Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 109(4): 1030-1033, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1064339

ABSTRACT

Boffito et al. recalled the critical importance to correctly interpret protein binding. Changes of lopinavir pharmacokinetics in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are a perfect illustration. Indeed, several studies described that total lopinavir plasma concentrations were considerably higher in patients with severe COVID-19 than those reported in patients with HIV. These findings have led to a reduction of the dose of lopinavir in some patients, hypothesizing an inhibitory effect of inflammation on lopinavir metabolism. Unfortunately, changes in plasma protein binding were never investigated. We performed a retrospective cohort study. Data were collected from the medical records of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 treated with lopinavir/ritonavir in intensive care units or infectious disease departments of Toulouse University Hospital (France). Total and unbound concentrations of lopinavir, C reactive protein, albumin, and alpha-1-acid glycoprotein (AAG) levels were measured during routine care on the same samples. In patients with COVID-19, increased total lopinavir concentration is the result of an increased AAG-bound lopinavir concentration, whereas the unbound concentration remains constant, and insufficient to reduce the severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) viral load. Although international guidelines have recently recommended against using lopinavir/ritonavir to treat severe COVID-19, the description of lopinavir pharmacokinetics changes in COVID-19 is a textbook case of the high risk of misinterpretation of a total drug exposure when changes in protein binding are not taken into consideration.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/pharmacokinetics , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Lopinavir/pharmacokinetics , Plasma/physiology , Protein Binding/physiology , Aged , Albumins/metabolism , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , C-Reactive Protein/metabolism , Female , Glycoproteins/metabolism , Humans , Lopinavir/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Viral Load
3.
Therapie ; 76(4): 319-333, 2021.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-867129

ABSTRACT

The knowledge of factors of pharmacokinetic variability is important in order to personalize pharmacological treatment, particularly for drugs with a narrow therapeutic range for which pharmacological therapeutic monitoring is recommended. Inflammation is a protective response against acute infections and injuries that contributes to intra- and inter-individual variability in drug exposure by modulating the activity of enzymes involved in drug metabolism, and by altering the binding of drugs to plasma proteins. The understanding of the impact of inflammation on drug metabolism and the related clinical consequences allow to better take into consideration the effect of inflammation on the variability of drug exposure. We first summarized the molecular mechanisms by which inflammation contributes to the inhibition of drug metabolism enzymes. We then presented an updated overview of the consequences of the outcome of acute infectious event on pharmacokinetic exposure of drugs with a narrow therapeutic range and that are substrates of cytochrome P450, and the related clinical consequences. Finally, in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, we reported examples of drug overexposures in COVID- 19 infected patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/metabolism , Pandemics , Pharmacokinetics , Acute Disease/epidemiology , Humans , Inflammation/epidemiology , Inflammation/metabolism , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL